Su Caihui Yuan [2020]36number

About the revision of Jiangsu Family Council Vocational College

Notification of Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Measures

All units and departments:

According to needs, the school revised "Jiangsu Family Press Vocational College Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Measures", is now issued to you, please follow the execution.

Annex:1.Jiangsu Family Press Vocational College Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Measures

2.Annual Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Comprehensive Assessment Form

3. Series (Ministry) Evaluation Group Evaluation Form

Jiangsu Caixing Vocational College

2020year7month3Day

Annex1

Jiangsu Family Press Vocational College Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Measures

For furtherStandardize the teaching quality assessment work of our school teachers,Accurate understanding and objective evaluation of teachers' performance and task completion of the task，Strengthen teaching quality management，Continuous improvementTeaching quality and level,Based on the actual situation of our school, formulate these measures.

sky bet login

(1) Scientific principles。Evaluation content、Evaluation methods should be scientific、Reasonable，Seeking truth from facts。

(2) Principles of objectivity。Formation of various assessment results，It must be based on factual materials、Various statistical numbers，Do not fake it。

(3) The principle of justice。The assessment process must be objective、Public、fairness,Justice.

2. Evaluation objects

In -school with teaching tasks of the yearDiving, part -timeTeacher.

3. Organization and management of assessment

(1) The assessment is performed in the department sky bet login (department) unit，Evaluation and evaluation of teachers of the department from the department (department)。Each Department (Department) Establish Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Group，Department (Department) Director as the team leader，Comprehensive responsible for the assessment of teachers of the headquarters。

(2) The school set up a school teacher teaching quality assessment leadership group，Leaders in charge of teaching schools as the team leader，Director of the Academic Affairs OfficeRen RenDeputy Leader，Member units include Academic Affairs Office、Quality Office、Organization Personnel Office、Discipline Inspection Commission and other departments，Responsible for coordinating and guiding the assessment work，Examine the assessment materials of teachers' teaching work in various departments (departments)，Organizing the review of the results of the organization，Acceptance teachers' reconsideration of teaching quality assessment results and reports of unfair behaviors in the assessment process。Evaluation Leading Group Office is located in the Academic Affairs Office.

4. Evaluation content

Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation is mainly evaluated and evaluated by the department (department)、Teaching Supervision Evaluation、Teaching ability evaluation、Student evaluation four parts。Among them (Ministry) assessment evaluation40%, teaching supervision evaluation20%, teaching ability evaluation accounted for30%，Student evaluationOccupy10%。

(1) Series (Ministry) Evaluation and Evaluation: The assessment team of each department (department) is based on the teacher'sTeacher Morality,undertaking the course workload、Participate in teaching construction and reform、Perform daily teaching work specifications、Complete evaluation indicators such as the department (ministry) key work tasks for assessment。

(2) Teaching supervision and evaluation: Determine according to the department (department) and school -level teaching supervision and hearing scores。

(3) Teaching ability evaluation: According to the teaching ability organized by the department (department)。

above (Ministry) assessment and evaluation、Teaching Supervision Evaluation、Teaching ability competition plan is independently determined by each department ()，Economic Department (Department) Party and Government Joint Meeting approves and reported to the Academic Affairs Office for filing。

(4) Student evaluation: unified by the schoolOrganize all students who have been evaluated by teachers who have been evaluatedBasisEvaluation Standards for evaluation. every termCarry out a student evaluation, everyTeacher in the classThis itemGrade Takesemester evaluationThe highest score.To ensure the rationality and objectivity of students' evaluation，Total number of students in a single -door course class as the base，Remove10%The minimum student evaluation score is calculated.

(5)There is one of the following situations during the assessment period of the teacher，Add points according to the following regulations:

1. Delivery and Education，Love care for students，Enthusiastic social public welfare undertakings，With noble morality and advanced deeds，Get a national teaching teacher plus5points, obtained the provincial teaching teacher plus32points;10points.

2. Actively participate orGuide students to participate in eachClassCompetition, if the results are prominent, add the points according to the following situation:

Guide students to participate in a type of skill competition (includingInnovation and Entrepreneurship Competition).12points,10points,8Plugs, the provincial first prize, second prize, and third prizes are added8points,6points,4points; guide students to participate in the second -class skill competition，获国家级First prize, second prize, and third prize plus3points,2points,1points.

Participate in the Teacher Teaching Property Competition，获国家级First prize, second prize, and third prize plus18points,15points,12Plugs, the provincial first prize, second prize, and third prizes are added12points,9points,6Get the school -level first prize, second prize, and third prize, respectively6points,3points,1.5points。

3. Woning the Provincial Teaching Achievement Award Special Award、First Prize、Second prize plus20points,16points,12points; won the National Teaching Achievement Award Special Award、First Prize、Second prize plus50points,30points,20points;

4. Actively apply for boutique online open courses, boutique textbooks, etc.，Get the provincial -level project to Kajia5points, getNational Level ProtectionAdd10points.

(No. 12、3、4Item score is the project reward，The person in charge of the project team allocates。）

5. Get othersSchool -level teaching competitionFirst prize, second prize, and third prize plus2points,1points,0.5points.

6. Other Scriptures (Ministry) Sky bet app download Teachers Teaching Quality Evaluation Group identificationextra points.

(5) There are one of the following situations during the assessment period of the teacher，Deducting points according to the following requirements:

(1) Don’t seriously organize teaching during class，As a result, the classroom teaching order is chaotic，On -site teaching inspector or video surveillance inspector inspection found，And being verified by the School Academic Affairs Office，Every time you buckle0.1points;

(2) Other violations"Teaching Management Standards for Teaching Management of Jiangsu Fortune Vocational College41197_41198matters.

5. The assessment method

(1) Teachers' teaching quality assessment work is unified by the Academic Affairs Office，Each department (department) is responsible for specific implementation，Evaluate once a year。Each department (department) is responsible for the full -time teacher of the department and the school administrative and class teacher implementation assessment of the course teaching in this semester。cross -department (ministry) The assessment of the full -time teacher who undertakes the course teaching belongs to its affiliated department (department)。

(2) Teacher teaching quality is divided into excellent、Qualification and unqualified three levels，FromEach Department (Department)According toTeacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Total ScorerankingApprove，Among them, the number of outstanding levels does not exceed the number of teachers in this department to participate in the number of teachers15%。

(3) Series (Ministry) TeacherTeachingAssessmentGroup working procedures:（1) At the end of each year, the evaluation data formed by various assessment indicators，Calculate the comprehensive score of the teaching quality assessment of teachers in this department; (2)，Ranking within the scope of the department (department)，Assessed the annual teaching quality assessment level of each teacher; (3) The results of the assessment were reviewed by the Department of Party and Government Co -Association，After publicizing no objection within the scope of this department，Report the school assessment leadership group，If necessary, you need to provide a detailed assessment basis to the school assessment leadership group。

(4) School Teacher Teaching Quality Assessment Leading Group Work Procedure: (1) Check whether each department (department) evaluate according to the assessment plan and procedure; (2) The accidents and major issues occurred in the assessment of the Subject Office; (3) Problems reflected at the school level。Teachers have objections to objection to the results of teaching quality assessment.，Reports on the unfair behavior in the assessment process，Evaluation Leading Group Acceptance Application and Report。

(5) Preliminary assessment as an excellent teacher,FanOne of the following situations, the assessment of the yearLower a level recognition：

1. Those who are subject to party discipline and political discipline;

2. Teaching Supervisor Evaluation and Student Evaluation EvaluationTotal score is ranked in the whole schoolPost -30%；

3. For those who were talked about being inspected by classroom teaching and quality supervision group;

4. No in -depth industry enterprisesPracticeExercise；

5. OnceGeneral Teaching accident；

6. Other teachers' teaching quality assessment leadership group identified by the school teachers。

(6)Removal of assessmentThe result is60pointsThe followingIt is definitely not uniform, allOne of the following situations, itsThat yearThe assessment level is unqualified:

1.Disposal in the classroom that violates the party's education policy、Divine and Moral Style Style;

2. Those who have serious teaching accidents occur;

3. OccurredTwo or above general teaching accidents；

4. Student evaluation average score is lower than60points orStudent reflectionClassroomTeaching effectPoor;

5. Those who refuse to accept teaching tasks;

6. Other teachers' teaching quality assessment leadership group identified by the school teachers。

6. Application of assessment results

(1)Each department (department) related organizations responsible for the teaching work assessment of teachers、Material collection、Calculation、Evaluation and other work，and responsible for archiving the teacher's assessment information，At the same timewillAssessment results are reported to the Academic Affairs Office for the record.

(2) Each yearTeacher Teaching QualityAssessment results，It will be appointed as a teacher、Awards、The important basis for promotion and renewal of professional titles。

(3) Each department (department) when arranging the next semester or annual course，Sorting of the assessment score，Arrange teachers' teaching tasks in order，PreferredGuaranteeSorting inPre -Basic workload of teachers. rightThe assessment ranking is at the end of this department (department) at the end1Teacher named，The teaching workload sky bet games online arranged for the next year will not exceed the basic specification of performance salaryTeachingWorkload90%；The assessment ranking for two consecutive years is after this department (department)2Teacher named，The teaching workload sky bet games online arranged for the next year does not exceed the basic teaching workload specified in performance salary80%; for three consecutive yearsThe assessment ranking is behind this department (department)3Teachers named, fromThe affiliated department (department) proposes to the school's relevant departments to adjust the motion of their jobs。Administrative and courses with poor annual assessment results，Each department (department) should no longer arrange teaching tasks。

Seven,Attachment

(1) This method is from2020year1month1Execution from the day, the original related documents at the same timeabolition.

(2) These measures are explained by the Academic Affairs Office.

Annex2

Annual Teacher Teaching Quality Evaluation Comprehensive Assessment Form

Director of the Department of Department signed (chapter):

Annex3

Series (Ministry) Evaluation Group Evaluation Form